Statements and Speeches
Statement in the Congressional Record
Sep 15 2005
Mr. President, I rise to talk about the importance of our Constitution. In
This year, Constitution Day is going to be commemorated not just in
If you visit the Senate today and all this week and you come into one of the galleries, if you walk in, they will give you a copy of the Constitution. Today I was bringing in some visitors, from
I am a Delawarean who treasures what our Constitution does. It is the basic law of our land, the law on which all the other laws are built. The Constitution which is becoming the longest lived Constitution in the history of the world and the Constitution most replicated by every nation on Earth is the one we celebrate this Saturday.
I wish to take a couple of moments to share and remind us again how the Constitution is introduced. It starts off – many of us know these words. In fact, many of us as schoolchildren, and our children as well, had to learn the preamble to the Constitution, which reads as follows:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
“We the people,” those three words encapsulate the very essence of what makes
We have seen how powerful
The first 10 amendments to the Constitution are called the Bill of Rights. They lay out some of the liberties that we take for granted, but people in other places around the world would love to have these liberties. They do not and maybe they never will. I hope they will. But our Constitution has, among other liberties, the freedom to bear arms. It has the right to say what is on our mind. In fact, there are newspapers, television stations, our radio stations – all of us enjoy freedom of speech. People can vote for whomever they want. If they like the job we are doing, they can reelect us; if they don't, they can throw us out and put somebody else in these seats. They can run for the job themselves.
They have a right to a jury by their peers. They have a right to be protected from unlawful searches without an order of a judge. There are all kinds of protections in our Constitution. There is one given a little attention here lately, given a decision by a district court judge out in
I would have us go back to the beginning of our Nation's history, when we were born as a nation. I would have us remember, when the first President, George Washington, was sworn into office and they finished the ceremony – I think it was in
Several years before that when they were up in
The folks who gathered up in
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. If we go over the copy of the Constitution that we shared with the folks coming into the Senate today as visitors, we read the language alongside the raw language of the amendment and it says these words:
The first amendment protects religious freedom by prohibiting the establishment of an official or exclusive church or sect.
I am not a lawyer, certainly not a constitutional lawyer. But I think I can read. When I read literally the words of the Constitution, I believe what our Founding Fathers were trying to do is to make sure we don't establish in this country a church that somehow is sanctioned by the Government. They just didn't want to go there. Seeing what happened in some other countries, they didn't want to have any part of that.
Having said that, our Founding Fathers were a religious people. They were people of faith, and they drew on their faith, frankly, in drawing up this document and trying to resolve their differences in reaching the core on this Constitution.
The Pledge of Allegiance, I don't believe, existed when those folks were working on the Constitution. In fact, the words “under God” were only added, I believe, in 1954, some 51 years ago. I would ask, given the reliance on faith and people calling on their faith in 1787 when drafting the Constitution, how would they feel about a Pledge of Allegiance that said, “one nation under God”? My guess is they would feel pretty good about it. Rather than saying that we ought to strike that language “under God,” they would probably say we ought to keep that in, and I would have to agree with them.
We will hear more about this issue going forward, I am sure. Hopefully, when we do, we will think back not just about the Constitution and what the words actually say in the first amendment, but we will also think back to the way people comported themselves and how they drew on their faith in 1787 as they wrestled with drafting this document and coming to consensus on this document. I think they would want the words “one nation, under God” to be in the Pledge of Allegiance if we were to have one.
We have all said it hundreds, probably thousands, of times. I think we got it right in 1954, and I think we ought to leave it that way.